The A.I.D.S. Man
This week I read something on my
Smartphone via the BBC News App that was basically an article about A.I.D.S.
and how it has been traced back to Kinshasa in Africa in the 1920s and it is claimed that
the virus probably crossed from chimpanzees to humans even before the 1920s… this
made me very angry and it is because it is all genuine nonsense… A.I.D.S. and/or H.I.V. do not
originate from a chimpanzee and they do not originate in Africa… in 1994 in one
African country Harold Branson featured as, well, The A.I.D.S. Man (a person from England connected to A.I.D.S.). In 1994
Harold Branson nuclear bombed at least two African countries – The Democratic
Republic of Congo and Kenya - but in 1992 he had nuclear bombed The Republic of
South Africa and all this gained him mega criminal power over Africa (he had also nuclear bombed some non-Africa countries). In July 1994 Harold Branson
featured on the U.K.'s BBC Radio1 about some of his involvement with A.I.D.S.
Harold Branson is known as The A.I.D.S. King for very good reasons. Bob Marley
used to hint a lot about Harold Branson and A.I.D.S. 'Yeke Yeke' by Mori Kante
depicts a lot about A.I.D.S. I think A.I.D.S. can be traced back to… 1978. Yes,
1978. And no earlier. Although there were predictions about diseases, viruses etcetera.
It is comparable to the public nonsense that Club Amnesia on Ibiza opened in 1978 when in fact it first opened in 1987 and the claim that Virgin was founded in 1970 when in fact it was founded in 1958. Guess who is to blame for this nonsense? And there are many other examples of things around the World where it is claimed that events occurred many years or decades before they actually did.
I saw a photo of Prince William holding his son Prince George - why do these people use Royal Titles? It is so old hat. I mean you need to be very very qualified - and not just academically - to use a title such as Prince. Is William a Prince? But anyway, it is quite visible that Prince George wants to get away from his father. Why is this? I wondered. And I continue to wonder.
There is a movie coming onto the scene for October (2014) - 'Gone Girl' - and judging by it's trailer some or much of it will hint about Madeleine McCann and what is suspected to have happened to her... the U.K. release of this movie coincides with when Harold Branson is due to be talked to by some of The Authorities about Madeleine McCann i.e. in October 2014... I was just wondering if this coincidental release of 'Gone Girl' is intentional or unintentional... and I am wondering if 'Gone Girl' is another example of the people that perceive themselves to be 'The Rich & Famous' claiming to be solving big problems when in fact they are just causing big problems... But to be clear, I have not seen this movie yet so I can not make any certain comment/s.
This week I saw a superb mentality in writing on the back of a van - "We're not here to make money, we're here to make friends.".
There is a movie coming onto the scene for October (2014) - 'Gone Girl' - and judging by it's trailer some or much of it will hint about Madeleine McCann and what is suspected to have happened to her... the U.K. release of this movie coincides with when Harold Branson is due to be talked to by some of The Authorities about Madeleine McCann i.e. in October 2014... I was just wondering if this coincidental release of 'Gone Girl' is intentional or unintentional... and I am wondering if 'Gone Girl' is another example of the people that perceive themselves to be 'The Rich & Famous' claiming to be solving big problems when in fact they are just causing big problems... But to be clear, I have not seen this movie yet so I can not make any certain comment/s.
This week I saw a superb mentality in writing on the back of a van - "We're not here to make money, we're here to make friends.".
End of BlogPost #58
